Monday, August 28, 2017

Diaglogic Reading the C-R-O-W-D Experience

The time on the clock and daily schedule shows its Storytime as the student moves the clothespin to the next activity.  Everyone is sitting on the large carpet rug with legs crosses and waiting for related Study book as written on lesson plan.

It is important, as one read stories to have students interactively involved in the storyline.  One technique created by Dr. Grover Whitehurst was Dialogic Reading and let’s take a closer look at the acronym C-R-O-W-d.  check out this clip to give you a better understand and implementation of this active participatory way of reading stories with students at https://youtu.be/EpmARhxerJs  (5:32).

Remember, pre-read the story book and write out questions and/or statements related to C-R-O-W-D on each label per page toward building student’s enjoyment of books, vocabulary, comprehension and other related literacy skills.  Also as the students pose questions, you may want to write those down as well to add at a later date for the book as well.   You can write the student’s responses on chart paper with their initials next to their question and/or statement for them to make association between verbal comments and printed words. 

Yes, for the books written on the lesson plan place label questions and/or statements on the pages that relate to C-R-O-W-D for interactive participatory reading experiences.  Knowledge is powerful.


#DrBKWEC

Beginning School Year Storybooks

The students enter your classroom learning environment some are excited, shy, anxious, afraid and an array of other emotions.  Teachers have created the classroom learning environment to assist the students to feel WELCOME but you observe there is something that’s needs to be done.  Aha!  Let’s walk over to the bookshelf and pull a book that addresses transitioning to new classroom, teachers, classmates, new school and so forth.  Check out my YouTube clip to different books that can be read at https://youtu.be/Hr7xoCF06gU (6:26).

Here’s a list of books with the assistance of Rena’ Hoggard and Tawanda Terry for these.
1.       Chrysanthemum
2.       David goes to school
3.       Llama Llama misses mama
4.       Pete the Cat rocking in my school shoes
5.       Swimmy
6.       The kissing hand
7.       Roar and Sparkles go to school
8.       What color is my underwear?
9.       Have you filled a bucket today?
10.   There was an old lady who swallowed some books
11.   You’re finally here
12.   First day jitters
13.   Dear teacher
14.   If you take a mouse to school
15.   Wimberley worried
16.   The way I feel
17.   Rosie goes to preschool
18.   Shubert’s big voice

Have a terrific school year welcoming your students and their family members to your high-quality culturally developmentally age appropriate learning experiences.  Knowledge is powerful.


#DRBKWEC

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Ask Dr. BKW - Can early childhood educators spank children in child care facilities?



As part of the “Introduction to Early Childhood Education” class a portion of time is set aside for students to raise questions needed for clarification.  It is reiterated that enrolled students go back to their places of employment to ensure that all children/students in conjunction with their parents/family members are given high-quality culturally developmentally age appropriate practices.

The student posed this questions “What does a teacher do when they see another teacher spank a child?”  in prior classes the issue of child abuse, neglect and maltreatment were discussed then revisited to ensure the student understand her role related to the action witnessed.  

NO!, was written on the whiteboard to give the quick response.  However, I had to provide the student with supported documentations to grasp it was not a personal opinion.  Below are documentations/conversations that was represented prior and new information to assist with next step(s) for action.  

1.       Code of Ethical Conduct and Statement of Commitment – A positon statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) at http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PSETH05.pdf
The NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct offers guidelines for responsible behavior and set forth a common basis for resolving the principal ethical dilemmas encountered in early childhood care and education (Gordon & Williams-Browne, 2016, p. 224).
Section I:  Ethical responsibilities to children
I-1.5: To create and maintain safe and healthy settings that foster children’s social, emotional, cognitive, and physical development and that respect their dignity and their contributions.
P-1.1:  Above all, we shall not harm children.  We shall not participate in practices that are emotionally damaging, physically harmful, disrespectful, degrading, dangerous, exploitative or intimidating to children.  This principle has precedence over all others in this Code.
P-1.8:  We shall be familiar with the risk factors for and symptoms of child abuse and neglect, including physical, sexual, verbal and emotional abuse and physical, emotional, educational and medical neglect.  We shall know and follow state laws and community procedures that protect children against abuse and neglect.
P-1.9:  When we have reasonable cause to suspect child abuse or neglect, we shall report it to the appropriate community agency and follow up to ensure that appropriate action has been taken.  When appropriate, parents or guardians will be informed that the referral will be or has been made.
P-1.10:  When another person tells us of his or her suspicion that a child is being abused or neglected, we shall assist that person in taking appropriate action in order to protect the child.
P-1.11:  When we become aware of a practice or situation that endangers the health, safety, or well-being of children, we have an ethical responsibility to protect children or inform parents and/or others who can.
Section III:  Ethical responsibilities to colleagues
B-Responsibilities to employers
P-3B.3:  We shall not violate laws or regulations designed to protect children and shall take appropriate action consistent with this Code when aware of such violations.
P-3B.5:  When we have a concern about circumstances or conditions that impact the quality of care and education within the program, we shall inform the program’s administration or, when necessary, other appropriate authorities.

In the state of North Carolina as part of the parents/family members orientation packet includes the “Discipline and Behavior Management Policy” view  http://ncchildcare.nc.gov/pdf_forms/discipline.pdf  where name of child, signature of parents/guardians and dated.  The first bullet statement in the right-hand column states, “We DO NOT spank, shake, bite, pinch, push, pull, slap, or otherwise physically punish the child.  It should be noted, I told the student (all) to post this document on the “Parent Board” and highlight the above statement for parents/family members to view periodically.

The Summary of the North Carolina Child Care Law and Rules can be viewed at http://ncchildcare.nc.gov/pdf_forms/summary_ncchildcare_laws_rules.pdf  that has a sub-category titled, “Child Abuse or Neglect”.  Within the paragraph it is bolded “North Carolina law requires any person who suspects child abuse or neglect to report the case to the county department of social services”.  Also any person call the Division of Child Development and Early Education at (919) 527-6500 or 1-800-859-0829 to report suspected child abuse or neglect in a child care facility (can be made anonymously).

Child care licensed facilities in North Carolina as part of the star-rated system include have the infant-toddler environment rating scale (ITERS) and early childhood environment rating scale revised (ECERS-R) completed in relationship to environment contents.  Within the ECERS-R number 31 Discipline under column 3 (minimal) stated, “3.1 Staff do not use physical punishment or severe methods” (Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998, p. 39). 

In addition, new rules adopted September 23, 2016 by North Carolina Division of Child Development and Early Education were one is “Child Care Rule 10A NCAC 09.0705 Special Training Requirements.  All staff members shall complete “Recognizing and Responding to Suspicious of Child Maltreatment within two months of employment.  This training is available online https://www.preventchildabusenc.org/services/trainings-and-professional-development/rrcourse
It must be noted that current employed staff must complete by June 30, 2017.  Also copies of certificates of all ITS-SIDS, Playground Safety and Child Maltreatment must be in staff member’s files.

Yes, from the initial question posed, the inquiring student but for all were given this information hardcopies of documents and posted in Sakai online to ensure they were equipped with the knowledge, skills and disposition when faced with this or similar actions related to child abuse, neglect and/or maltreatment of children/students who depend on adults to maintain their safety.
Therefore, the answer is “NO” we do not spank children/students in our classrooms and/or in the learning facilities.  If one witness a colleague using physical actions report to local Department of Social Services and/or State Division of Child Development of Education and Early Care and talk with administrators.  Remember, to document with date, time and actions of people involved.  If it is possible video tape as well.  One must know your STATE rules and regulations to reporting child abuse, neglect or maltreatment and the proper change of command.  WE must respect ALL children in providing a healthy safe environments for learning.  Yes, we are the caretakers for the voiceless children.


Let’s take a look into ways to respond that are developmentally age appropriate (DAP) as an educator’s role modeling appropriate behaviors as the adult in the learning environment.
1.       Remove yourself from the child.
2.       Take 3 or more deep breaths to regroup and resolve the situation appropriately.
3.       If needed, ask colleague to join group (maintaining teacher-child ratio) while you step out of the room to collect your thoughts and return when ready to continue facilitating learning.
4.       Engage in conversation with child of act and discuss appropriate ways to resolve in the positive.

Children follow the actions we as adults model for them.  Our goal for discipline is to guide them positive appropriate solutions not physical harm that may continue into adulthood.  STOP!  THINK! RESPOND in positive manners.

References:
Code of Ethical Conduct and Statement of Commitment – A positon statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) at http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PSETH05.pdf
Discipline and behavior management policy at http://ncchildcare.nc.gov/pdf_forms/discipline.pdf
Gordon, A.M., & Williams-Browne, K.  (2016).  Beginning essentials in early childhood education (3rd ed.).  Boston, MA:  Cengage.
Harms, T., Clifford, R. M., & Cryer, D.  (1998).  Early childhood environment rating scale revised edition. 
               
New York, NY:  Teachers College Press.
Summary of the North Carolina Rules and Regulations at http://ncchildcare.nc.gov/pdf_forms/summary_ncchildcare_laws_rules.pdf

Monday, January 2, 2017

Early Childhood Expulsions and Suspensions Barriers to Education Opportunities of Life



As I instructed courses in early childhood education (birth to age 8) and on-site consultations where one of the first areas of concern is “behavior management” from biting to physical aggression (i.e., kicking, hitting) on age mates and/or adults.  The main goal of early childhood educations is to promote overall school readiness through domain areas (i.e., cognitive, social, emotional, physical) toward becoming productive citizens of society.

During the conversation with adult students enrolled in early childhood education courses, it was shared for children exhibiting inappropriate challenging behaviors their programs expelled the children whose parents/family members sought out other programs not making new site aware of past experiences.  Or, the children were suspended from three (3) to ten (10) days of educational program.  Therefore, they have missed valuable instructional culturally developmentally age appropriate materials that explore their knowledge through challenging FUN activities. 

All children age entitled to high quality educational settings particularly when most research showed African American boys are expelled and/or suspended compared to their age mates (US Department of Education, 2014, 2016).  Therefore, it is crucial for educators, parents/family members and other stakeholders are working toward the same common goal to close the achievement gap by incorporating culturally developmentally age appropriated practices to eliminate or reduce the average number of expulsions and/or suspensions of early childhood children.  The early expulsions and suspensions are predictors where these children are ten times more likely to drop out of high school, academic failure and grade retention, negative attitudes toward school and incarceration (American Psychological Association, 2008 & Lamont et. at., 2013).

Here are some of the techniques and/or strategies that are shared with education students and/or on-site participants when discussing a specific child exhibiting challenging behaviors.

1.      Record time sampling of challenging behaviors looking for patterns to adjust learning environment due to being award of child’s trigger times, materials, age mates and so forth. 

2.      Record anecdotal notes ensuring they are written in objective tone of what was observed.  Look for patterns and note the challenges that need to be modified ensuring child is using self-regulation to resolve issues.

3.      Review child’s file to see if there are key eye-opening health issues that they also may be a reason for the challenging behavior(s).  Talk with colleagues on how to design a culturally developmentally age ABC (antecedent-behaviors-consequences) functional plan (O’Neil et., al., 1997) to reduce and/or eliminate the behaviors.  NOTE:  Research appropriate techniques and professional experts in the field than once strategies are recorded just remember change does not happen overnight.  Educators and others must be consistent in the hierarchical strategies written on the ABC functional plan.

4.      Set up a meeting on-site and/or home visit to discuss the challenging behaviors and best strategies in a partnership toward elevating and/or reducing those behaviors.  As you work in partnership as the parents/family members to make positive statements about the child then educator continue to share positive statements from the site point-of-view.  The second level is to engage in conversation of challenging behaviors with strategies/techniques both groups will implement on consistent bases where the child receive the same message from home to school and vice versa.  Remember, to contact parents/family members on progress of challenging behaviors.  It is important that the educator remind parents/family members that the act of challenging behaviors take time for change but the key is to be consistent.  The last level of the conversation is to share positive outcomes from the goals of the child.  I recommend educators practice and review points to be made prior to meeting not to alienate parents/family members toward working together in partnership.

5.      Based from data recorded, conversations from parent/family members and other professional create the ABC functional plan and review often to modify as needed. NOTE:  If preschool age and older (3 to 8) engage the child in conversation on the consequences for inappropriate actions.  You are helping the child be accountable for actions for self-regulation.



We as educators and stakeholders must take an active role to elevate the high percentage of children being expelled and/or suspended toward fulfilling their dreams into adulthood.  If you are seeking more research-based hands on training contact DrBKW Early Childhood Education Services via Facebook, email drbrenwilliamson@gmail.com or #DRBKWEC.  

References:

Lamont, J.H., Devore, C.D., Allison, M., Ancona, R., Barnett, S. E., Gunther, R., et. al. (2013).  Out-of-school suspension and expulsion.  Pediatrics, 131, e1000-e1007.

O’Neil, R. E., Homer, R.H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Story, K., & Newton, J. S.  (1997).  Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior:  A practical handbook (2nd ed.).  Pacific Grove, CA:  Brooks/Cole.

US Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (2014, March).  Civil rights data collection.  Data snapshot:  Early childhood education (Issue Brief #2).  Washington, DC:  Author.  Retrieved from http://www.2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-early-learning-snapshot.pdf.

US Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (2016, June).  2013-2014 civil rights data collection:  Key data high lights on equity and opportunity gaps in our nation’s public schools.  Retrieved from http://www.2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-2013-14.html.

US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Education (2014, December).  Policy statement on expulsion and suspension policies in early childhood settings.  Washington, DC:  Authors.  Retrieved from http://ww.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ecd/child-health-development/reducing-suspensions-and-expulsion-practices